Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: A Systematic Review for Preference-Sensitive Surgical Decision-Making.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7
- Published
- 2026 Nov 6
- Container
- International urogynecology journal
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7,
title = {Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: A Systematic Review for Preference-Sensitive Surgical Decision-Making.},
author = {Wang Q and Jiang X and Lin C},
year = {2026},
journal = {International urogynecology journal},
doi = {10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: A Systematic Review for Preference-Sensitive Surgical Decision-Making. AU - Wang Q AU - Jiang X AU - Lin C PY - 2026 JO - International urogynecology journal DO - 10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7 ER -
APA
Q, W., X, J., & C, L. (2026). Obliterative versus Reconstructive Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: A Systematic Review for Preference-Sensitive Surgical Decision-Making.. International urogynecology journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06927-7
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:12:12.676Z