The NAMs conundrum in the current regulatory risk assessment: progress without clarity?
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2
- Published
- 2026 Aug 25
- Container
- Archives of toxicology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2,
title = {The NAMs conundrum in the current regulatory risk assessment: progress without clarity?},
author = {Chaudhry Q and Rogiers V and Coenraads PJ and Benfenati E and Bernauer U and Galli CL and Panteri E and Vanhaecke T},
year = {2026},
journal = {Archives of toxicology},
doi = {10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The NAMs conundrum in the current regulatory risk assessment: progress without clarity? AU - Chaudhry Q AU - Rogiers V AU - Coenraads PJ AU - Benfenati E AU - Bernauer U AU - Galli CL AU - Panteri E AU - Vanhaecke T PY - 2026 JO - Archives of toxicology DO - 10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2 ER -
APA
Q, C., V, R., PJ, C., E, B., U, B., CL, G., E, P., & T, V. (2026). The NAMs conundrum in the current regulatory risk assessment: progress without clarity?. Archives of toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04529-2
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T01:22:36.632Z