Remimazolam vs midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z
- Published
- 2026-08-17
- Container
- Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z,
title = {Remimazolam vs midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
author = {Salma Bahnasy and Ahmad Omar Saleh and Ibrahim A. Ababneh and Bishoy Fahim and Tasnim Tarboush and Rovan Aladham and Ismail Elkhattib and Hatem Eltaly and Mohamed Elnaggar},
year = {2026},
journal = {Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology},
doi = {10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Remimazolam vs midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis AU - Salma Bahnasy AU - Ahmad Omar Saleh AU - Ibrahim A. Ababneh AU - Bishoy Fahim AU - Tasnim Tarboush AU - Rovan Aladham AU - Ismail Elkhattib AU - Hatem Eltaly AU - Mohamed Elnaggar PY - 2026 JO - Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology DO - 10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z ER -
APA
Bahnasy, S., Saleh, A. O., Ababneh, I. A., Fahim, B., Tarboush, T., Aladham, R., Elkhattib, I., Eltaly, H., & Elnaggar, M. (2026). Remimazolam vs midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-026-05774-z
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:40:54.979Z