Vacuum-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sheaths in pediatric supine mini-PCNL: a comparative analysis.

Turedi B, Sezer A, Ozkent MS, Hamarat MB, Sarica K

DOI: 10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9
Published: 2026 Sep 4
Container: Urolithiasis
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9,
  title = {Vacuum-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sheaths in pediatric supine mini-PCNL: a comparative analysis.},
  author = {Turedi B and Sezer A and Ozkent MS and Hamarat MB and Sarica K},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Urolithiasis},
  doi = {10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Vacuum-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sheaths in pediatric supine mini-PCNL: a comparative analysis.
AU  - Turedi B
AU  - Sezer A
AU  - Ozkent MS
AU  - Hamarat MB
AU  - Sarica K
PY  - 2026
JO  - Urolithiasis
DO  - 10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9
ER  -

APA

B, T., A, S., MS, O., MB, H., & K, S. (2026). Vacuum-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sheaths in pediatric supine mini-PCNL: a comparative analysis.. Urolithiasis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02051-9

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:25:49.023Z