Single and tandem stents in sheep iliac arteries: is there a difference in patency?

Schürmann K, Vorwerk D, Bücker A, Grosskortenhaus S, Günther RW

DOI: 10.1007/s002709900289
Published: 1998 Sep-Oct
Container: Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s002709900289,
  title = {Single and tandem stents in sheep iliac arteries: is there a difference in patency?},
  author = {Schürmann K and Vorwerk D and Bücker A and Grosskortenhaus S and Günther RW},
  year = {1998},
  journal = {Cardiovascular and interventional radiology},
  doi = {10.1007/s002709900289},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900289}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Single and tandem stents in sheep iliac arteries: is there a difference in patency?
AU  - Schürmann K
AU  - Vorwerk D
AU  - Bücker A
AU  - Grosskortenhaus S
AU  - Günther RW
PY  - 1998
JO  - Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
DO  - 10.1007/s002709900289
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900289
ER  -

APA

K, S., D, V., A, B., S, G., & RW, G. (1998). Single and tandem stents in sheep iliac arteries: is there a difference in patency?. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900289

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T22:45:57.564Z