New versus old: comparison of the 2022 ACR/EULAR versus the 1990 ACR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in a real-world cohort.

Bergner R, Löffler C, Schulz P, Klank D, Friedrich J.

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6
Published
2025-10-13
Container
Rheumatol Int
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6,
  title = {New versus old: comparison of the 2022 ACR/EULAR versus the 1990 ACR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in a real-world cohort.},
  author = {Bergner R and  Löffler C and  Schulz P and  Klank D and  Friedrich J.},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Rheumatol Int},
  doi = {10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - New versus old: comparison of the 2022 ACR/EULAR versus the 1990 ACR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in a real-world cohort.
AU  - Bergner R
AU  -  Löffler C
AU  -  Schulz P
AU  -  Klank D
AU  -  Friedrich J.
PY  - 2025
JO  - Rheumatol Int
DO  - 10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6
ER  - 

APA

R, B., C, L., P, S., D, K., & J., F. (2025). New versus old: comparison of the 2022 ACR/EULAR versus the 1990 ACR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in a real-world cohort.. Rheumatol Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05965-6

Source records