A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.

Wardlaw JM, Brindle W, Casado AM, Shuler K, Henderson M, Thomas B, Macfarlane J, Muñoz Maniega S, Lymer K, Morris Z, Pernet C, Nailon W, Ahearn T, Mumuni AN, Mugruza C, McLean J, Chakirova G, Tao YT, Simpson J, Stanfield AC, Johnston H, Parikh J, Royle NA, De Wilde J, Bastin ME, Weir N, Farrall A, Valdes Hernandez MC, SINAPSE Collaborative Group

Open source

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8
Published: 2012 Nov
Container: European radiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8,
  title = {A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.},
  author = {Wardlaw JM and Brindle W and Casado AM and Shuler K and Henderson M and Thomas B and Macfarlane J and Muñoz Maniega S and Lymer K and Morris Z and Pernet C and Nailon W and Ahearn T and Mumuni AN and Mugruza C and McLean J and Chakirova G and Tao YT and Simpson J and Stanfield AC and Johnston H and Parikh J and Royle NA and De Wilde J and Bastin ME and Weir N and Farrall A and Valdes Hernandez MC and SINAPSE Collaborative Group},
  year = {2012},
  journal = {European radiology},
  doi = {10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.
AU  - Wardlaw JM
AU  - Brindle W
AU  - Casado AM
AU  - Shuler K
AU  - Henderson M
AU  - Thomas B
AU  - Macfarlane J
AU  - Muñoz Maniega S
AU  - Lymer K
AU  - Morris Z
AU  - Pernet C
AU  - Nailon W
AU  - Ahearn T
AU  - Mumuni AN
AU  - Mugruza C
AU  - McLean J
AU  - Chakirova G
AU  - Tao YT
AU  - Simpson J
AU  - Stanfield AC
AU  - Johnston H
AU  - Parikh J
AU  - Royle NA
AU  - De Wilde J
AU  - Bastin ME
AU  - Weir N
AU  - Farrall A
AU  - Valdes Hernandez MC
AU  - SINAPSE Collaborative Group
PY  - 2012
JO  - European radiology
DO  - 10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8
ER  -

APA

JM, W., W, B., AM, C., K, S., M, H., B, T., J, M., S, M. M., K, L., Z, M., C, P., W, N., T, A., AN, M., C, M., J, M., G, C., YT, T., J, S., AC, S., H, J., J, P., NA, R., J, D. W., ME, B., N, W., A, F., MC, V. H., & Group, S. C. (2012). A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research.. European radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2500-8

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T21:18:16.183Z