VI-RADS is not enough: why image quality is the key to reliable bladder cancer staging

Jelle Barentsz, Sebastianus Wilheimus van Koeverden, Marloes van der Leest

Open source

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y
Published: 2025-10-22
Container: European Radiology
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y,
  title = {VI-RADS is not enough: why image quality is the key to reliable bladder cancer staging},
  author = {Jelle Barentsz and Sebastianus Wilheimus van Koeverden and Marloes van der Leest},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {European Radiology},
  doi = {10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - VI-RADS is not enough: why image quality is the key to reliable bladder cancer staging
AU  - Jelle Barentsz
AU  - Sebastianus Wilheimus van Koeverden
AU  - Marloes van der Leest
PY  - 2025
JO  - European Radiology
DO  - 10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y
ER  -

APA

Barentsz, J., Koeverden, S. W. V., & Leest, M. V. D. (2025). VI-RADS is not enough: why image quality is the key to reliable bladder cancer staging. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12086-y

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T20:34:13.793Z