Quality metrics of synthetic radiomics data do not predict improvement under simulated external validation: an ecological fallacy across 50 public datasets
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4
- Published
- 2026-06-20
- Container
- European Radiology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4,
title = {Quality metrics of synthetic radiomics data do not predict improvement under simulated external validation: an ecological fallacy across 50 public datasets},
author = {Clemente García-Hidalgo and José Antonio Consentino Hernández and José Vicente Cayuela Espí and Gonzalo Pagán Vicente and Juan Francisco Mula Ponce and Ángel Vázquez Olmos},
year = {2026},
journal = {European Radiology},
doi = {10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Quality metrics of synthetic radiomics data do not predict improvement under simulated external validation: an ecological fallacy across 50 public datasets AU - Clemente García-Hidalgo AU - José Antonio Consentino Hernández AU - José Vicente Cayuela Espí AU - Gonzalo Pagán Vicente AU - Juan Francisco Mula Ponce AU - Ángel Vázquez Olmos PY - 2026 JO - European Radiology DO - 10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4 ER -
APA
García-Hidalgo, C., Hernández, J. A. C., Espí, J. V. C., Vicente, G. P., Ponce, J. F. M., & Olmos, Á. V. (2026). Quality metrics of synthetic radiomics data do not predict improvement under simulated external validation: an ecological fallacy across 50 public datasets. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12703-4
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:25:08.675Z