Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification-a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z
- Published
- 2026 Sep 18
- Container
- European radiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z,
title = {Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification-a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening.},
author = {Peters J and van der Waal D and van Gils CH and Broeders MJM},
year = {2026},
journal = {European radiology},
doi = {10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification-a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening. AU - Peters J AU - van der Waal D AU - van Gils CH AU - Broeders MJM PY - 2026 JO - European radiology DO - 10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z ER -
APA
J, P., D, V. D. W., CH, V. G., & MJM, B. (2026). Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification-a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening.. European radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:36:57.124Z