Digital versus paper-based voiding diaries: a feasibility study of usability, data quality, patient satisfaction and adherence.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5
- Published
- 2026 Jul 20
- Container
- World journal of urology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5,
title = {Digital versus paper-based voiding diaries: a feasibility study of usability, data quality, patient satisfaction and adherence.},
author = {Wenk MJ and Renner LV and Lockl J and Fechner P and Ruhland N and Carl N and Mangold MH and Krause H and Westhoff N},
year = {2026},
journal = {World journal of urology},
doi = {10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Digital versus paper-based voiding diaries: a feasibility study of usability, data quality, patient satisfaction and adherence. AU - Wenk MJ AU - Renner LV AU - Lockl J AU - Fechner P AU - Ruhland N AU - Carl N AU - Mangold MH AU - Krause H AU - Westhoff N PY - 2026 JO - World journal of urology DO - 10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5 ER -
APA
MJ, W., LV, R., J, L., P, F., N, R., N, C., MH, M., H, K., & N, W. (2026). Digital versus paper-based voiding diaries: a feasibility study of usability, data quality, patient satisfaction and adherence.. World journal of urology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06609-5
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:43:48.758Z