RETRACTED ARTICLE: Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y
- Published
- 2014-11-04
- Container
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 29/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y,
title = {RETRACTED ARTICLE: Accuracy of
endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with
abnormal uterine bleeding},
author = {Ibrahim A. Abdelazim and Khaled M. Abdelrazak and Assem A. M. Elbiaa and Mohamed Al-Kadi and Amr H. Yehia},
year = {2014},
journal = {Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
doi = {10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - RETRACTED ARTICLE: Accuracy of
endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with
abnormal uterine bleeding
AU - Ibrahim A. Abdelazim
AU - Khaled M. Abdelrazak
AU - Assem A. M. Elbiaa
AU - Mohamed Al-Kadi
AU - Amr H. Yehia
PY - 2014
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
DO - 10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y
ER - APA
Abdelazim, I. A., Abdelrazak, K. M., Elbiaa, A. A. M., Al-Kadi, M., & Yehia, A. H. (2014). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3523-y
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:45:03.887Z