Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2
- Published
- 2018 Dec
- Container
- Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 8/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2,
title = {Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial.},
author = {Sweed MS and El-Saied MM and Abou-Gamrah AE and El-Sabaa HA and Abdel-Hamid MM and Hemeda H and Mansour AM and Shawky ME and El-Sayed MA and Mohamed RM},
year = {2018},
journal = {Archives of gynecology and obstetrics},
doi = {10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial. AU - Sweed MS AU - El-Saied MM AU - Abou-Gamrah AE AU - El-Sabaa HA AU - Abdel-Hamid MM AU - Hemeda H AU - Mansour AM AU - Shawky ME AU - El-Sayed MA AU - Mohamed RM PY - 2018 JO - Archives of gynecology and obstetrics DO - 10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2 ER -
APA
MS, S., MM, E., AE, A., HA, E., MM, A., H, H., AM, M., ME, S., MA, E., & RM, M. (2018). Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4894-2
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:25:06.977Z