Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus Limberg flap reconstruction for uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective comparative study.

Guna M, Yogish V, J MK, R A EC.

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z
Published
2026-08-10
Container
Langenbecks Arch Surg
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z,
  title = {Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus Limberg flap reconstruction for uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective comparative study.},
  author = {Guna M and  Yogish V and  J MK and  R A EC.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Langenbecks Arch Surg},
  doi = {10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus Limberg flap reconstruction for uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective comparative study.
AU  - Guna M
AU  -  Yogish V
AU  -  J MK
AU  -  R A EC.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Langenbecks Arch Surg
DO  - 10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z
ER  - 

APA

M, G., V, Y., MK, J., & EC., R. A. (2026). Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment versus Limberg flap reconstruction for uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective comparative study.. Langenbecks Arch Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04187-z

Source records