ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial.

Leisser C, Ruiss M, Pilwachs C, Findl O.

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y
Published
2022-02-23
Container
Spektrum Augenheilkd
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y,
  title = {ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial.},
  author = {Leisser C and  Ruiss M and  Pilwachs C and  Findl O.},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Spektrum Augenheilkd},
  doi = {10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial.
AU  - Leisser C
AU  -  Ruiss M
AU  -  Pilwachs C
AU  -  Findl O.
PY  - 2023
JO  - Spektrum Augenheilkd
DO  - 10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y
ER  - 

APA

C, L., M, R., C, P., & O., F. (2023). ILM peeling with ILM flap transposition vs. classic ILM peeling for small and medium macula holes-a prospective randomized trial.. Spektrum Augenheilkd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-022-00515-y

Source records