Clinical performance of an innovative self-cure bulk-fill composite compared to dual-cure and light-cure bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1
- Published
- 2026 Jun 3
- Container
- Clinical oral investigations
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1,
title = {Clinical performance of an innovative self-cure bulk-fill composite compared to dual-cure and light-cure bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.},
author = {Ragab MA and Elmahy WA and Elgayar M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical oral investigations},
doi = {10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clinical performance of an innovative self-cure bulk-fill composite compared to dual-cure and light-cure bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. AU - Ragab MA AU - Elmahy WA AU - Elgayar M PY - 2026 JO - Clinical oral investigations DO - 10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1 ER -
APA
MA, R., WA, E., & M, E. (2026). Clinical performance of an innovative self-cure bulk-fill composite compared to dual-cure and light-cure bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.. Clinical oral investigations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06945-1
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:09:26.735Z