Comparison of three occlusal splint material systems manufactured by conventional, subtractive, and additive techniques.

Rocha MF, de Oliveira Nunes IV, da Motta NRA, Paraíso AJM, Fraga MAA, Dalmaschio CJ, de Moraes RR, Finck NS, Malacarne-Zanon J

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7
Published
2026 Nov 9
Container
Clinical oral investigations
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7,
  title = {Comparison of three occlusal splint material systems manufactured by conventional, subtractive, and additive techniques.},
  author = {Rocha MF and de Oliveira Nunes IV and da Motta NRA and Paraíso AJM and Fraga MAA and Dalmaschio CJ and de Moraes RR and Finck NS and Malacarne-Zanon J},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical oral investigations},
  doi = {10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of three occlusal splint material systems manufactured by conventional, subtractive, and additive techniques.
AU  - Rocha MF
AU  - de Oliveira Nunes IV
AU  - da Motta NRA
AU  - Paraíso AJM
AU  - Fraga MAA
AU  - Dalmaschio CJ
AU  - de Moraes RR
AU  - Finck NS
AU  - Malacarne-Zanon J
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical oral investigations
DO  - 10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7
ER  - 

APA

MF, R., IV, D. O. N., NRA, D. M., AJM, P., MAA, F., CJ, D., RR, D. M., NS, F., & J, M. (2026). Comparison of three occlusal splint material systems manufactured by conventional, subtractive, and additive techniques.. Clinical oral investigations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07250-7

Source records