Correction: How universal quality standards in intervention meta-analyses favor evidence from medical over psychosocial studies.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4
- Published
- 2026 Jun 29
- Container
- European child & adolescent psychiatry
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4,
title = {Correction: How universal quality standards in intervention meta-analyses favor evidence from medical over psychosocial studies.},
author = {Groenman AP and van Dijk A and Dekkers TJ and van den Hoofdakker BJ and van der Oord S and Luman M and Psyllou C},
year = {2026},
journal = {European child \& adolescent psychiatry},
doi = {10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Correction: How universal quality standards in intervention meta-analyses favor evidence from medical over psychosocial studies. AU - Groenman AP AU - van Dijk A AU - Dekkers TJ AU - van den Hoofdakker BJ AU - van der Oord S AU - Luman M AU - Psyllou C PY - 2026 JO - European child & adolescent psychiatry DO - 10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4 ER -
APA
AP, G., A, V. D., TJ, D., BJ, V. D. H., S, V. D. O., M, L., & C, P. (2026). Correction: How universal quality standards in intervention meta-analyses favor evidence from medical over psychosocial studies.. European child & adolescent psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-026-03113-4
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:02:44.968Z