Author reply to comment by Brandenburg et al. on: Large differences between test strategies for the detection of anti-Borrelia antibodies are revealed by comparing eight ELISAs and five immunoblots
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3
- Published
- 2011-05-31
- Container
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3,
title = {Author reply to comment by Brandenburg et al. on: Large differences between test strategies for the detection of anti-Borrelia antibodies are revealed by comparing eight ELISAs and five immunoblots},
author = {C. W. Ang},
year = {2011},
journal = {European Journal of Clinical Microbiology \& Infectious Diseases},
doi = {10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Author reply to comment by Brandenburg et al. on: Large differences between test strategies for the detection of anti-Borrelia antibodies are revealed by comparing eight ELISAs and five immunoblots AU - C. W. Ang PY - 2011 JO - European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases DO - 10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3 ER -
APA
Ang, C. W. (2011). Author reply to comment by Brandenburg et al. on: Large differences between test strategies for the detection of anti-Borrelia antibodies are revealed by comparing eight ELISAs and five immunoblots. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1301-3
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:10:53.929Z