Robotic versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of pathological quality indicators
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7
- Published
- 2026-05-29
- Container
- Techniques in Coloproctology
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7,
title = {Robotic versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of pathological quality indicators},
author = {S. Morarasu and S. Lunca and C. Clancy and W. L. Ong and E. Morpurgo and G.-M. Dimofte},
year = {2026},
journal = {Techniques in Coloproctology},
doi = {10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Robotic versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of pathological quality indicators AU - S. Morarasu AU - S. Lunca AU - C. Clancy AU - W. L. Ong AU - E. Morpurgo AU - G.-M. Dimofte PY - 2026 JO - Techniques in Coloproctology DO - 10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7 ER -
APA
Morarasu, S., Lunca, S., Clancy, C., Ong, W. L., Morpurgo, E., & Dimofte, G. (2026). Robotic versus laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of pathological quality indicators. Techniques in Coloproctology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-026-03369-7
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:56:42.283Z