Generative AI vs. Human Sources for Sexual Health Information: Credibility, Trust, and Behavioral Intentions in a U.S. College Sample
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z
- Published
- 2026-10-19
- Container
- Archives of Sexual Behavior
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z,
title = {Generative AI vs. Human Sources for Sexual Health Information: Credibility, Trust, and Behavioral Intentions in a U.S. College Sample},
author = {Jacqueline Woerner and Tiffany L. Marcantonio and Humberto López Castillo},
year = {2026},
journal = {Archives of Sexual Behavior},
doi = {10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Generative AI vs. Human Sources for Sexual Health Information: Credibility, Trust, and Behavioral Intentions in a U.S. College Sample AU - Jacqueline Woerner AU - Tiffany L. Marcantonio AU - Humberto López Castillo PY - 2026 JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior DO - 10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z ER -
APA
Woerner, J., Marcantonio, T. L., & Castillo, H. L. (2026). Generative AI vs. Human Sources for Sexual Health Information: Credibility, Trust, and Behavioral Intentions in a U.S. College Sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-026-03594-z
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:12:03.523Z