Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.

Bazoukis G, Stavrakis S, Zhou J, Bollepalli SC, Tse G, Zhang Q, Singh JP, Armoundas AA

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
Published
2021 Jan
Container
Heart failure reviews
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3,
  title = {Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.},
  author = {Bazoukis G and Stavrakis S and Zhou J and Bollepalli SC and Tse G and Zhang Q and Singh JP and Armoundas AA},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Heart failure reviews},
  doi = {10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.
AU  - Bazoukis G
AU  - Stavrakis S
AU  - Zhou J
AU  - Bollepalli SC
AU  - Tse G
AU  - Zhang Q
AU  - Singh JP
AU  - Armoundas AA
PY  - 2021
JO  - Heart failure reviews
DO  - 10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
ER  - 

APA

G, B., S, S., J, Z., SC, B., G, T., Q, Z., JP, S., & AA, A. (2021). Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients-a systematic review.. Heart failure reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3

Source records