A comparison between two indices derived from automated pupillometry devices.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4
- Published
- 2026 Aug 29
- Container
- Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4,
title = {A comparison between two indices derived from automated pupillometry devices.},
author = {Bandoni C and Mounir K and Iannuzzi F and Berardino A and Tarantino F and Andaloussi MR and Taccone FS and Battaglini D and Patroniti N'A and Robba C},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of clinical monitoring and computing},
doi = {10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparison between two indices derived from automated pupillometry devices. AU - Bandoni C AU - Mounir K AU - Iannuzzi F AU - Berardino A AU - Tarantino F AU - Andaloussi MR AU - Taccone FS AU - Battaglini D AU - Patroniti N'A AU - Robba C PY - 2026 JO - Journal of clinical monitoring and computing DO - 10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4 ER -
APA
C, B., K, M., F, I., A, B., F, T., MR, A., FS, T., D, B., N'A, P., & C, R. (2026). A comparison between two indices derived from automated pupillometry devices.. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01490-4
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:28:01.939Z