Discovering the critical number of respondents to validate an item in a questionnaire: the binomial cut-level content validity proposal
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6
- Published
- 2026-03-12
- Container
- Quality & Quantity
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6,
title = {Discovering the critical number of respondents to validate an item in a questionnaire: the binomial cut-level content validity proposal},
author = {Helder Gomes Costa and José Fabiano da Serra Costa and Edilvando Pereira Eufrazio and Eduardo Shimoda and Aldo Shimoya},
year = {2026},
journal = {Quality \& Quantity},
doi = {10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Discovering the critical number of respondents to validate an item in a questionnaire: the binomial cut-level content validity proposal AU - Helder Gomes Costa AU - José Fabiano da Serra Costa AU - Edilvando Pereira Eufrazio AU - Eduardo Shimoda AU - Aldo Shimoya PY - 2026 JO - Quality & Quantity DO - 10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6 ER -
APA
Costa, H. G., Costa, J. F. D. S., Eufrazio, E. P., Shimoda, E., & Shimoya, A. (2026). Discovering the critical number of respondents to validate an item in a questionnaire: the binomial cut-level content validity proposal. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-02665-6
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:48:41.745Z