Determining what matters most to patients: qualitative interview techniques and methodological considerations for concept saliency analysis and reporting
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6
- Published
- 2026-09-25
- Container
- Quality of Life Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6,
title = {Determining what matters most to patients: qualitative interview techniques and methodological considerations for concept saliency analysis and reporting},
author = {Chloe Carmichael and Stephanie Fairhurst and Harriet Makin and Catherine Bottomley and Natalie Aldhouse},
year = {2026},
journal = {Quality of Life Research},
doi = {10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Determining what matters most to patients: qualitative interview techniques and methodological considerations for concept saliency analysis and reporting AU - Chloe Carmichael AU - Stephanie Fairhurst AU - Harriet Makin AU - Catherine Bottomley AU - Natalie Aldhouse PY - 2026 JO - Quality of Life Research DO - 10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6 ER -
APA
Carmichael, C., Fairhurst, S., Makin, H., Bottomley, C., & Aldhouse, N. (2026). Determining what matters most to patients: qualitative interview techniques and methodological considerations for concept saliency analysis and reporting. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04395-6
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:23:50.885Z