The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
- Published
- 2017
- Container
- Scientometrics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8,
title = {The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review.},
author = {Batagelj V and Ferligoj A and Squazzoni F},
year = {2017},
journal = {Scientometrics},
doi = {10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review. AU - Batagelj V AU - Ferligoj A AU - Squazzoni F PY - 2017 JO - Scientometrics DO - 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8 ER -
APA
V, B., A, F., & F, S. (2017). The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review.. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:00:40.145Z