Comparative study of grab, DGT, and bryophyte sampling as monitoring program for quality management: case of arsenic in freshwater.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9
- Published
- 2025 May
- Container
- Environmental science and pollution research international
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9,
title = {Comparative study of grab, DGT, and bryophyte sampling as monitoring program for quality management: case of arsenic in freshwater.},
author = {Rougerie J and Simon S and Fondaneche P and Perez-Salva I and Palfner L and Rebillard JP and Barbe L and Fabry C and Guibaud G},
year = {2025},
journal = {Environmental science and pollution research international},
doi = {10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative study of grab, DGT, and bryophyte sampling as monitoring program for quality management: case of arsenic in freshwater. AU - Rougerie J AU - Simon S AU - Fondaneche P AU - Perez-Salva I AU - Palfner L AU - Rebillard JP AU - Barbe L AU - Fabry C AU - Guibaud G PY - 2025 JO - Environmental science and pollution research international DO - 10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9 ER -
APA
J, R., S, S., P, F., I, P., L, P., JP, R., L, B., C, F., & G, G. (2025). Comparative study of grab, DGT, and bryophyte sampling as monitoring program for quality management: case of arsenic in freshwater.. Environmental science and pollution research international. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36470-9
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T13:10:21.453Z