Comparison of lesion detection rates between FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7
- Published
- 2026 Aug 14
- Container
- Japanese journal of radiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7,
title = {Comparison of lesion detection rates between FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.},
author = {Wang Q and Cai X and Liu H and Liu Y},
year = {2026},
journal = {Japanese journal of radiology},
doi = {10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of lesion detection rates between FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head studies. AU - Wang Q AU - Cai X AU - Liu H AU - Liu Y PY - 2026 JO - Japanese journal of radiology DO - 10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7 ER -
APA
Q, W., X, C., H, L., & Y, L. (2026). Comparison of lesion detection rates between FAPI PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.. Japanese journal of radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02058-7
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:45:46.579Z