Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on PET/CT radiation safety: a comparative analysis between human experts and large language models.

Shih PF

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6
Published
2026 Aug 26
Container
Japanese journal of radiology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6,
  title = {Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on PET/CT radiation safety: a comparative analysis between human experts and large language models.},
  author = {Shih PF},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Japanese journal of radiology},
  doi = {10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on PET/CT radiation safety: a comparative analysis between human experts and large language models.
AU  - Shih PF
PY  - 2026
JO  - Japanese journal of radiology
DO  - 10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6
ER  - 

APA

PF, S. (2026). Quality and reliability of YouTube videos on PET/CT radiation safety: a comparative analysis between human experts and large language models.. Japanese journal of radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02059-6

Source records