Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x
- Published
- 2022 Mar
- Container
- Journal of bioethical inquiry
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x,
title = {Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved.},
author = {Komesaroff PA},
year = {2022},
journal = {Journal of bioethical inquiry},
doi = {10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved. AU - Komesaroff PA PY - 2022 JO - Journal of bioethical inquiry DO - 10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x ER -
APA
PA, K. (2022). Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved.. Journal of bioethical inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:34:04.262Z