Comparative outcomes of Hugo RAS and Versius surgical systems versus da Vinci in four urological procedures: a systematic review

Sarujan Thayalan, Saif Toubasey, Cynthia O’Sullivan, Ben Challacombe

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7
Published
2026-11-06
Container
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7,
  title = {Comparative outcomes of Hugo RAS and Versius surgical systems versus da Vinci in four urological procedures: a systematic review},
  author = {Sarujan Thayalan and Saif Toubasey and Cynthia O’Sullivan and Ben Challacombe},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Robotic Surgery},
  doi = {10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative outcomes of Hugo RAS and Versius surgical systems versus da Vinci in four urological procedures: a systematic review
AU  - Sarujan Thayalan
AU  - Saif Toubasey
AU  - Cynthia O’Sullivan
AU  - Ben Challacombe
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Robotic Surgery
DO  - 10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7
ER  - 

APA

Thayalan, S., Toubasey, S., O’Sullivan, C., & Challacombe, B. (2026). Comparative outcomes of Hugo RAS and Versius surgical systems versus da Vinci in four urological procedures: a systematic review. Journal of Robotic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04125-7

Source records