Differential performance of statistical versus machine learning methods in partial volume correction in oncologic F18-FDG PET/CT scanning.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4
- Published
- 2026 Jul 31
- Container
- Annals of nuclear medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4,
title = {Differential performance of statistical versus machine learning methods in partial volume correction in oncologic F18-FDG PET/CT scanning.},
author = {Metwally HK and Gawaad HA and Khalil MM},
year = {2026},
journal = {Annals of nuclear medicine},
doi = {10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Differential performance of statistical versus machine learning methods in partial volume correction in oncologic F18-FDG PET/CT scanning. AU - Metwally HK AU - Gawaad HA AU - Khalil MM PY - 2026 JO - Annals of nuclear medicine DO - 10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4 ER -
APA
HK, M., HA, G., & MM, K. (2026). Differential performance of statistical versus machine learning methods in partial volume correction in oncologic F18-FDG PET/CT scanning.. Annals of nuclear medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-026-02255-4
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:57:34.520Z