When an Isolated Bankart Repair is Not Enough: Comparing Latarjet Versus Augmentation with Remplissage.

Pascual-Leone N, Khilnani T, Eskew JR, Brusalis CM, Dines JS.

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y
Published
2026-07-16
Container
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y,
  title = {When an Isolated Bankart Repair is Not Enough: Comparing Latarjet Versus Augmentation with Remplissage.},
  author = {Pascual-Leone N and  Khilnani T and  Eskew JR and  Brusalis CM and  Dines JS.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med},
  doi = {10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - When an Isolated Bankart Repair is Not Enough: Comparing Latarjet Versus Augmentation with Remplissage.
AU  - Pascual-Leone N
AU  -  Khilnani T
AU  -  Eskew JR
AU  -  Brusalis CM
AU  -  Dines JS.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
DO  - 10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y
ER  - 

APA

N, P., T, K., JR, E., CM, B., & JS., D. (2026). When an Isolated Bankart Repair is Not Enough: Comparing Latarjet Versus Augmentation with Remplissage.. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-026-10041-y

Source records