Is the use of primary cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty a reliable option? A systematic review.

Corradi N, Trimarchi A, Soldati AL, Martini I, Colombelli A, Belluati A

DOI: 10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5
Published: 2026 Sep 1
Container: Musculoskeletal surgery
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5,
  title = {Is the use of primary cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty a reliable option? A systematic review.},
  author = {Corradi N and Trimarchi A and Soldati AL and Martini I and Colombelli A and Belluati A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Musculoskeletal surgery},
  doi = {10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Is the use of primary cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty a reliable option? A systematic review.
AU  - Corradi N
AU  - Trimarchi A
AU  - Soldati AL
AU  - Martini I
AU  - Colombelli A
AU  - Belluati A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Musculoskeletal surgery
DO  - 10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5
ER  -

APA

N, C., A, T., AL, S., I, M., A, C., & A, B. (2026). Is the use of primary cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty a reliable option? A systematic review.. Musculoskeletal surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-026-00982-5

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:06:57.425Z