Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w
- Published
- 2024 Oct
- Container
- Ambio
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w,
title = {Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice.},
author = {Dawson NM and Coolsaet B and Bhardwaj A and Brown D and Lliso B and Loos J and Mannocci L and Martin A and Oliva M and Pascual U and Sherpa P and Worsdell T},
year = {2024},
journal = {Ambio},
doi = {10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice. AU - Dawson NM AU - Coolsaet B AU - Bhardwaj A AU - Brown D AU - Lliso B AU - Loos J AU - Mannocci L AU - Martin A AU - Oliva M AU - Pascual U AU - Sherpa P AU - Worsdell T PY - 2024 JO - Ambio DO - 10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w ER -
APA
NM, D., B, C., A, B., D, B., B, L., J, L., L, M., A, M., M, O., U, P., P, S., & T, W. (2024). Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice.. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:00:18.648Z