Comparison of modified versus conventional laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: safety and efficacy.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x
- Published
- 2026 Sep 10
- Container
- Updates in surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x,
title = {Comparison of modified versus conventional laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: safety and efficacy.},
author = {Zhang Y and Yu X and Wang G and Xu Z and Wang L and Cui L and Hou C and Ling X and Zhang L},
year = {2026},
journal = {Updates in surgery},
doi = {10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of modified versus conventional laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: safety and efficacy. AU - Zhang Y AU - Yu X AU - Wang G AU - Xu Z AU - Wang L AU - Cui L AU - Hou C AU - Ling X AU - Zhang L PY - 2026 JO - Updates in surgery DO - 10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x ER -
APA
Y, Z., X, Y., G, W., Z, X., L, W., L, C., C, H., X, L., & L, Z. (2026). Comparison of modified versus conventional laparoscopic transcystic biliary drainage in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: safety and efficacy.. Updates in surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02845-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:47:04.051Z