What good are abstract and what-if models? Lessons from the Gaïa hypothesis

Sébastien Dutreuil

Open source

DOI: 10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4
Published: 2014-07-11
Container: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4,
  title = {What good are abstract and what-if models? Lessons from the Gaïa hypothesis},
  author = {Sébastien Dutreuil},
  year = {2014},
  journal = {History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences},
  doi = {10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - What good are abstract and what-if models? Lessons from the Gaïa hypothesis
AU  - Sébastien Dutreuil
PY  - 2014
JO  - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
DO  - 10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4
ER  -

APA

Dutreuil, S. (2014). What good are abstract and what-if models? Lessons from the Gaïa hypothesis. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0003-4

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:05:35.377Z