Evaluating how different versions of ChatGPT align with expert opinions on geriatric script concordance tests

Matthieu Lilamand, Théodore Decaix, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Richard Dufour, Gaëtan Gavazzi, Jacques Boaddaert, Claire Roubaud-Baudron, Hélène Vallet, Cédric Annweiler, Guillaume Chapelet

Open source

DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5
Published: 2025-10-20
Container: European Geriatric Medicine
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5,
  title = {Evaluating how different versions of ChatGPT align with expert opinions on geriatric script concordance tests},
  author = {Matthieu Lilamand and Théodore Decaix and Pierre-Antoine Gourraud and Richard Dufour and Gaëtan Gavazzi and Jacques Boaddaert and Claire Roubaud-Baudron and Hélène Vallet and Cédric Annweiler and Guillaume Chapelet},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {European Geriatric Medicine},
  doi = {10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating how different versions of ChatGPT align with expert opinions on geriatric script concordance tests
AU  - Matthieu Lilamand
AU  - Théodore Decaix
AU  - Pierre-Antoine Gourraud
AU  - Richard Dufour
AU  - Gaëtan Gavazzi
AU  - Jacques Boaddaert
AU  - Claire Roubaud-Baudron
AU  - Hélène Vallet
AU  - Cédric Annweiler
AU  - Guillaume Chapelet
PY  - 2025
JO  - European Geriatric Medicine
DO  - 10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5
ER  -

APA

Lilamand, M., Decaix, T., Gourraud, P., Dufour, R., Gavazzi, G., Boaddaert, J., Roubaud-Baudron, C., Vallet, H., Annweiler, C., & Chapelet, G. (2025). Evaluating how different versions of ChatGPT align with expert opinions on geriatric script concordance tests. European Geriatric Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01334-5

Source records

hal · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:18:52.282Z