Point-of-care ultrasound-guided external aortic compression compared to manual external aortic compression: a prospective crossover trial on healthy volunteers.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8
- Published
- 2026 Jul
- Container
- CJEM
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8,
title = {Point-of-care ultrasound-guided external aortic compression compared to manual external aortic compression: a prospective crossover trial on healthy volunteers.},
author = {Turcotte AS and Cournoyer A and Paquet J and Piette É and Zhu N and Bédard Michel W and Bilodeau L and Daoust R},
year = {2026},
journal = {CJEM},
doi = {10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Point-of-care ultrasound-guided external aortic compression compared to manual external aortic compression: a prospective crossover trial on healthy volunteers. AU - Turcotte AS AU - Cournoyer A AU - Paquet J AU - Piette É AU - Zhu N AU - Bédard Michel W AU - Bilodeau L AU - Daoust R PY - 2026 JO - CJEM DO - 10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8 ER -
APA
AS, T., A, C., J, P., É, P., N, Z., W, B. M., L, B., & R, D. (2026). Point-of-care ultrasound-guided external aortic compression compared to manual external aortic compression: a prospective crossover trial on healthy volunteers.. CJEM. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01149-8
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:57:17.815Z