Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6
- Published
- 2026 Sep 25
- Container
- Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6,
title = {Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques.},
author = {Rino Amorim A and Faria-Ribeiro M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Ophthalmic \& physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)},
doi = {10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques. AU - Rino Amorim A AU - Faria-Ribeiro M PY - 2026 JO - Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) DO - 10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6 ER -
APA
A, R. A., & M, F. (2026). Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques.. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00173-6
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:57:17.157Z