Direct 3D printing versus thermoforming for clear aligners and retainers: a scoping review and evidence map

Stefan Abela, Tommaso Castroflorio, Marco Migliorati

Open source

DOI
10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1
Published
2026-09-03
Container
Digital and Aligner Orthodontics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1,
  title = {Direct 3D printing versus thermoforming for clear aligners and retainers: a scoping review and evidence map},
  author = {Stefan Abela and Tommaso Castroflorio and Marco Migliorati},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Digital and Aligner Orthodontics},
  doi = {10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Direct 3D printing versus thermoforming for clear aligners and retainers: a scoping review and evidence map
AU  - Stefan Abela
AU  - Tommaso Castroflorio
AU  - Marco Migliorati
PY  - 2026
JO  - Digital and Aligner Orthodontics
DO  - 10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1
ER  - 

APA

Abela, S., Castroflorio, T., & Migliorati, M. (2026). Direct 3D printing versus thermoforming for clear aligners and retainers: a scoping review and evidence map. Digital and Aligner Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44525-026-00009-1

Source records