[Facts and fancy in intensive care. A good example: septic shock].

Devictor D

DOI: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5
Published: 1996 Sep
Container: Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/0929-693x-96-87569-5,
  title = {[Facts and fancy in intensive care. A good example: septic shock].},
  author = {Devictor D},
  year = {1996},
  journal = {Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie},
  doi = {10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Facts and fancy in intensive care. A good example: septic shock].
AU  - Devictor D
PY  - 1996
JO  - Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie
DO  - 10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5
ER  -

APA

D, D. (1996). [Facts and fancy in intensive care. A good example: septic shock].. Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie. https://doi.org/10.1016/0929-693x(96)87569-5

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:42:42.301Z