Cervical length measurement after 24+0 weeks: which estimate should guide clinical practice (Letter-to-the-Editor)?

Fogtmann Sejer EP, Kristensen SE, Tolsgaard MG.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028
Published: 2026-09-19
Container: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028,
  title = {Cervical length measurement after 24+0 weeks: which estimate should guide clinical practice (Letter-to-the-Editor)?},
  author = {Fogtmann Sejer EP and  Kristensen SE and  Tolsgaard MG.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Am J Obstet Gynecol},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cervical length measurement after 24+0 weeks: which estimate should guide clinical practice (Letter-to-the-Editor)?
AU  - Fogtmann Sejer EP
AU  -  Kristensen SE
AU  -  Tolsgaard MG.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Am J Obstet Gynecol
DO  - 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028
ER  -

APA

EP, F. S., SE, K., & MG., T. (2026). Cervical length measurement after 24+0 weeks: which estimate should guide clinical practice (Letter-to-the-Editor)?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2026.09.028

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T10:26:36.186Z