Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527
- Published
- 2022-01
- Container
- American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527,
title = {Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study},
author = {Isabelle Monier and Anne Ego and Alexandra Benachi and Alice Hocquette and Béatrice Blondel and François Goffinet and Jennifer Zeitlin},
year = {2022},
journal = {American Journal of Obstetrics \& Gynecology MFM},
doi = {10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study AU - Isabelle Monier AU - Anne Ego AU - Alexandra Benachi AU - Alice Hocquette AU - Béatrice Blondel AU - François Goffinet AU - Jennifer Zeitlin PY - 2022 JO - American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM DO - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527 ER -
APA
Monier, I., Ego, A., Benachi, A., Hocquette, A., Blondel, B., Goffinet, F., & Zeitlin, J. (2022). Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100527
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:05:19.199Z