Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Improving outcomes utilizing a standardized technique
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004
- Published
- 2018-03
- Container
- Asian Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004,
title = {Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Improving outcomes utilizing a standardized technique},
author = {Sze Li Siow and Hans Alexander Mahendran and Chee Ming Wong and Mark Hardin and Tien Loong Luk},
year = {2018},
journal = {Asian Journal of Surgery},
doi = {10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Improving outcomes utilizing a standardized technique AU - Sze Li Siow AU - Hans Alexander Mahendran AU - Chee Ming Wong AU - Mark Hardin AU - Tien Loong Luk PY - 2018 JO - Asian Journal of Surgery DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004 ER -
APA
Siow, S. L., Mahendran, H. A., Wong, C. M., Hardin, M., & Luk, T. L. (2018). Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Improving outcomes utilizing a standardized technique. Asian Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.004
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:49:10.923Z