Should white blood cell scan be replaced by (18)F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection?
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053
- Published
- 2015 Aug
- Container
- Annals of vascular surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053,
title = {Should white blood cell scan be replaced by (18)F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection?},
author = {Pinaquy JB and Berard X and Stecken L and Tlili G and M'zali F and Bordenave L and Pereyre S and Mayeux S and Cazanave C},
year = {2015},
journal = {Annals of vascular surgery},
doi = {10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Should white blood cell scan be replaced by (18)F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection? AU - Pinaquy JB AU - Berard X AU - Stecken L AU - Tlili G AU - M'zali F AU - Bordenave L AU - Pereyre S AU - Mayeux S AU - Cazanave C PY - 2015 JO - Annals of vascular surgery DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053 ER -
APA
JB, P., X, B., L, S., G, T., F, M., L, B., S, P., S, M., & C, C. (2015). Should white blood cell scan be replaced by (18)F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection?. Annals of vascular surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.053
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:21:34.875Z