Conventional Neuropathology Compared with Epigenetic Profiling for the Diagnosis of High-Grade Gliomas: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Umida Elmuradova, Stefanie Hammersen, Sven Rainer Kantelhardt, Ali Mulhem

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547
Published
2025
Container
Brain and Spine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547,
  title = {Conventional Neuropathology Compared with Epigenetic Profiling for the Diagnosis of High-Grade Gliomas: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study},
  author = {Umida Elmuradova and Stefanie Hammersen and Sven Rainer Kantelhardt and Ali Mulhem},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Brain and Spine},
  doi = {10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Conventional Neuropathology Compared with Epigenetic Profiling for the Diagnosis of High-Grade Gliomas: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
AU  - Umida Elmuradova
AU  - Stefanie Hammersen
AU  - Sven Rainer Kantelhardt
AU  - Ali Mulhem
PY  - 2025
JO  - Brain and Spine
DO  - 10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547
ER  - 

APA

Elmuradova, U., Hammersen, S., Kantelhardt, S. R., & Mulhem, A. (2025). Conventional Neuropathology Compared with Epigenetic Profiling for the Diagnosis of High-Grade Gliomas: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Brain and Spine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105547

Source records