Comparison of two clustering methods on surgical patients with adult spinal deformity: Importance of the variable choice on the obtained results and their interpretation.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Brain & spine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904,
title = {Comparison of two clustering methods on surgical patients with adult spinal deformity: Importance of the variable choice on the obtained results and their interpretation.},
author = {Larrieu D and Baroncini A and Bourghli A and Pizones J and Kleinstueck FS and Alanay A and Pellisé F and Charles YP and Boissiere L and Roscop C and Obeid I and European Spine Study Group},
year = {2026},
journal = {Brain \& spine},
doi = {10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of two clustering methods on surgical patients with adult spinal deformity: Importance of the variable choice on the obtained results and their interpretation. AU - Larrieu D AU - Baroncini A AU - Bourghli A AU - Pizones J AU - Kleinstueck FS AU - Alanay A AU - Pellisé F AU - Charles YP AU - Boissiere L AU - Roscop C AU - Obeid I AU - European Spine Study Group PY - 2026 JO - Brain & spine DO - 10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904 ER -
APA
D, L., A, B., A, B., J, P., FS, K., A, A., F, P., YP, C., L, B., C, R., I, O., & Group, E. S. S. (2026). Comparison of two clustering methods on surgical patients with adult spinal deformity: Importance of the variable choice on the obtained results and their interpretation.. Brain & spine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.105904
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:41:47.854Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:41:47.870Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:41:47.842Z