Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191
- Published
- 2021 Aug
- Container
- Biological conservation
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191,
title = {Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques.},
author = {Ibbett H and Jones JPG and St John FAV},
year = {2021},
journal = {Biological conservation},
doi = {10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques. AU - Ibbett H AU - Jones JPG AU - St John FAV PY - 2021 JO - Biological conservation DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191 ER -
APA
H, I., JPG, J., & FAV, S. J. (2021). Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques.. Biological conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109191
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:44:19.703Z