The environmental footprint and ecotoxicity of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia: do conservative modelling assumptions overstate the ecotoxicity of propofol? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 89-98.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060
- Published
- 2026 Sep 22
- Container
- British journal of anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060,
title = {The environmental footprint and ecotoxicity of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia: do conservative modelling assumptions overstate the ecotoxicity of propofol? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 89-98.},
author = {Dieulouard S and Kampman J and Nouette-Gaulain K},
year = {2026},
journal = {British journal of anaesthesia},
doi = {10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The environmental footprint and ecotoxicity of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia: do conservative modelling assumptions overstate the ecotoxicity of propofol? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 89-98. AU - Dieulouard S AU - Kampman J AU - Nouette-Gaulain K PY - 2026 JO - British journal of anaesthesia DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060 ER -
APA
S, D., J, K., & K, N. (2026). The environmental footprint and ecotoxicity of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia: do conservative modelling assumptions overstate the ecotoxicity of propofol? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 89-98.. British journal of anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.060
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:44:30.696Z